Re: [PATCHv2] PCI: iproc: platform: use device functions instead of OF.
Rob Herring <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL_JsqKufnuTbHpiJhvFcWQxvLWocnkZbr+HoHGVpvtJ2JDW8Q@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 7:55 PM Rosen Penev <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 5:32 PM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 6:44 PM Rosen Penev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Since this is supposed to be the higher layer file, use higher layer > > > than OF to handle this. Remove OF headers as a result. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > v2: fix platform_get_resource() parameters. > > > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c | 31 ++++++++------------ > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c > > > index 4c9a0c4bb923..488ff737ec52 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-platform.c > > > @@ -10,12 +10,8 @@ > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > > -#include <linux/of_address.h> > > > -#include <linux/of_pci.h> > > > -#include <linux/of_platform.h> > > > #include <linux/phy/phy.h> > > > > > > -#include "../pci.h" > > > #include "pcie-iproc.h" > > > > > > static const struct of_device_id iproc_pcie_of_match_table[] = { > > > @@ -40,11 +36,14 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > { > > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > > struct iproc_pcie *pcie; > > > - struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > > > - struct resource reg; > > > + struct resource *reg; > > > struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > > > int ret; > > > > > > + reg = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > > + if (!reg) > > > + return -ENODEV; > > > + > > > bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*pcie)); > > > if (!bridge) > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > @@ -52,26 +51,20 @@ static int iproc_pltfm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > pcie = pci_host_bridge_priv(bridge); > > > > > > pcie->dev = dev; > > > - pcie->type = (uintptr_t)of_device_get_match_data(dev); > > > - > > > - ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, ®); > > > - if (ret < 0) { > > > - dev_err(dev, "unable to obtain controller resources\n"); > > > - return ret; > > > - } > > > + pcie->type = (uintptr_t)device_get_match_data(dev); > > > > > > - pcie->base = devm_pci_remap_cfgspace(dev, reg.start, > > > - resource_size(®)); > > > + pcie->base = devm_pci_remap_cfgspace(dev, reg->start, > > > + resource_size(reg)); > > > if (!pcie->base) { > > > dev_err(dev, "unable to map controller registers\n"); > > > return -ENOMEM; > > > } > > > - pcie->base_addr = reg.start; > > > + pcie->base_addr = reg->start; > > > > > > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,pcie-ob")) { > > > + if (device_property_present(dev, "brcm,pcie-ob")) { > > > > If the property is boolean, it should use read_bool and vice-versa. > I don't see it as a boolean in dtsi. Looks like boolean to me: arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/northstar2/ns2.dtsi:156: brcm,pcie-ob; arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/northstar2/ns2.dtsi:185: brcm,pcie-ob; Rob