Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: ultrarisc: allow DP1000 driver to build as module
Jia Wang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <178539453673.553273.3197955075422858659.b4-reply@b4> |
On 2026-07-29 15:49 +0200, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 09:11:04AM +0800, Jia Wang via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: Jia Wang <[email protected]> > > > > CONFIG_PCIE_ULTRARISC is a tristate option, so the driver can be selected > > as a module when COMPILE_TEST or platform configuration allows it. Using > > builtin_platform_driver() leaves the module build without the module > > init/exit plumbing and causes modpost failures for the generated .ko. > > > > Use module_platform_driver() so the driver works for both module and > > built-in builds while keeping the existing tristate Kconfig entry. > > > > Add a remove callback and call dw_pcie_host_deinit() during removal so the > > root bus is torn down before devres releases the controller data. > > > > Fixes: 5fc35740c3b3 ("PCI: ultrarisc: Add UltraRISC DP1000 PCIe Root Complex driver") > > Signed-off-by: Jia Wang <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-ultrarisc.c | 10 +++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-ultrarisc.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-ultrarisc.c > > index 72ba5840b62d..9bee522a20e9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-ultrarisc.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-ultrarisc.c > > @@ -193,6 +193,13 @@ static int ultrarisc_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return 0; > > } > > > > +static void ultrarisc_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct ultrarisc_pcie *ultra = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > + > > + dw_pcie_host_deinit(&ultra->pci.pp); > > +} > > Since this driver registers an internal MSI controller, it is not safe to > remove it due to irq disposal concern. But you can build this driver as a > module though. > Right, I missed that this was intentionally changed to builtin_platform_driver() to prevent irqchip removal. I will drop this patch entirely in the next revision. Thanks! > - Mani > > -- > மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம் > Best regards, Jia Wang