Re: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices
[email protected] Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:28:26 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pci,org.infradead.lists.linux-i3c |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: Pre-existing issues: - [High] The workqueue `ibi->wq` is leaked on the error path if `master->op= s->request_ibi(dev, req)` fails. -- --- Patch [11]: [PATCH V3 11/14] i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-= IBI-capable devices --- commit a4ace89706edbc3219fece43aaef4d3c3e594148 Author: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> i3c: master: Reject IBI requests from non-IBI-capable devices This commit updates i3c_device_request_ibi() to verify that a device advertises IBI support before attempting to set up IBI handling. If the device lacks the I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP capability, it now returns early with -EOPNOTSUPP. > diff --git a/drivers/i3c/device.c b/drivers/i3c/device.c > index 5e6df6de02834..f1ba363b22a17 100644 > --- a/drivers/i3c/device.c > +++ b/drivers/i3c/device.c > @@ -204,12 +204,14 @@ int i3c_device_request_ibi(struct i3c_device *dev, > return ret; > =20 > i3c_bus_normaluse_lock(dev->bus); > - if (dev->desc) { > + if (!dev->desc) { > + ret =3D -ENOENT; > + } else if (!(dev->desc->info.bcr & I3C_BCR_IBI_REQ_CAP)) { > + ret =3D -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } else { > mutex_lock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock); > ret =3D i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked(dev->desc, req); [Severity: High] This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch interacts closely with I= BI request error handling, I noticed a potential resource leak in the underlyi= ng i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() function. Does this code leak the newly allocated workqueue if the request fails? drivers/i3c/master.c:i3c_dev_request_ibi_locked() { ... ibi->wq =3D alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(i3cdev_to_dev(dev->dev)), = WQ_MEM_RECLAIM); ... ret =3D master->ops->request_ibi(dev, req); if (ret) { kfree(ibi); dev->ibi =3D NULL; } =20 return ret; } Should destroy_workqueue(ibi->wq) be called before kfree(ibi) on this error path to prevent leaking the workqueue if a driver repeatedly fails to reque= st an IBI? > mutex_unlock(&dev->desc->ibi_lock); > - } else { > - ret =3D -ENOENT; > } > i3c_bus_normaluse_unlock(dev->bus); > --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260804133810.1849= [email protected]?part=3D11