[PATCH 2/9] perf thread-stack: Report branch stack hw_idx as not available

Amir Ayupov <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2026 02:06:33 -0700
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
thread_stack__br_sample() and thread_stack__br_sample_late() fill a
caller-supplied branch_stack that is typically allocated with zalloc(),
leaving hw_idx as 0. Zero is a valid hardware index, so consumers that
honour PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX see a reconstructed branch stack
claiming to start at LBR TOS entry 0.

These branch stacks are reconstructed from instruction trace and have no
hardware index at all. Set hw_idx to -1ULL, which is the established way
to say "not available" and matches what intel-pt and cs-etm already put
in the branch stacks they synthesise directly.

Signed-off-by: Amir Ayupov <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c b/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c
index c5ce741b07446..1a3dffa83bde2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c
@@ -624,6 +624,7 @@ void thread_stack__br_sample(struct thread *thread, int cpu,
 	unsigned int nr;
 
 	dst->nr = 0;
+	dst->hw_idx = -1ULL;
 
 	if (!ts)
 		return;
@@ -686,6 +687,7 @@ void thread_stack__br_sample_late(struct thread *thread, int cpu,
 	bool start = false;
 
 	dst->nr = 0;
+	dst->hw_idx = -1ULL;
 
 	if (!ts)
 		return;
-- 
2.52.0