Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] perf mem: Fix size tracking for mem_lvl's in perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf()
[email protected] Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:54:50 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(= s) to consider: Pre-existing issues: - [Critical] Insufficient stack buffer size and unsafe string operations in= memory event formatting lead to severe integer underflows and stack buffer= overflows. -- --- Patch [1]: [PATCH v3 1/6] perf mem: Fix size tracking for mem_lvl's in = perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf() --- commit ac4418d3c38063a8fbcd5e19348324171261d3d5 Author: Thomas Falcon <[email protected]> perf mem: Fix size tracking for mem_lvl's in perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf= () When printing memory info in perf script, the entire size of the buffer is passed to perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf() instead of the remaining size. Pass the remaining buffer size instead. > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > index 0b49fce251fcc..4e490f9cd3488 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c > @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ int perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf(char *out, size_t = sz, const struct mem_info * > i +=3D scnprintf(out, sz, "|OP "); > i +=3D perf_mem__op_scnprintf(out + i, sz - i, mem_info); > i +=3D scnprintf(out + i, sz - i, "|LVL "); > - i +=3D perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(out + i, sz, mem_info); > + i +=3D perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf(out + i, sz - i, mem_info); [Severity: Critical] This is a pre-existing issue, but by passing sz - i here, does it make it more likely to hit buffer overflows and integer underflows in the helper functions? In tools/perf/builtin-script.c:data_src__fprintf(), a fixed 100-byte stack buffer is used: char decode[100]; ... perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf(decode, 100, mi); As perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf() accumulates the printed length into i without bounding it to sz, if the total length exceeds 100 bytes (e.g., with multiple mem_lvl or snoop flags), i will exceed sz. This causes sz - i to underflow to a massive size_t value, bypassing bounds checks in subsequent helper calls. Additionally, if the remaining size becomes exactly 0 or very small, helpers like perf_mem__lvl_scnprintf() and perf_mem__snp_scnprintf() do: sz -=3D 1; /* -1 for null termination */ ... strcat(out, "Remote "); l +=3D 7; If passed a size of 0, sz -=3D 1 underflows to a massive unsigned value. Un= checked strcat() calls will then write out-of-bounds on the stack. > i +=3D scnprintf(out + i, sz - i, "|SNP "); > i +=3D perf_mem__snp_scnprintf(out + i, sz - i, mem_info); > i +=3D scnprintf(out + i, sz - i, "|TLB "); --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260803204540.1003= [email protected]?part=3D1