Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Add perf.data tracepoint events to trace.dat conversion
Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 19:27:19 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP-5=fV0Y=__y11kmcLBo+1yAMraUKf6pUpdNUfav4NJEocwGA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 7:07=E2=80=AFPM Ian Rogers <[email protected]> wrot= e: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 11:08=E2=80=AFAM Tanushree Shah <[email protected]= om> wrote: ... > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260608125951.90425-2-tsh= [email protected]/ > > Thanks again Tanushree for pursuing this. I see on sashiko.dev that > sashiko couldn't review the v2 patches because they failed to apply: > https://sashiko.dev/#/log/baseline/53604/2 > The SHA of perf-tools-next that sashiko.dev was trying was > d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409, which corresponds to "perf > machine: Check snprintf truncation for guest kallsyms path," added 4 > days ago: > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.= git/commit/?h=3Dperf-tools-next&id=3Dd04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d4= 09 > Could you rebase the patches so that we can benefit from the Sashiko revi= ew? Fwiw, I went through the individual patches in case I could give some useful early feedback. Everything looks great, and thanks for adding the test! Thanks, Ian