Re: [PATCH 12/12] perf jitdump: Validate unwinding sizes against record payload
Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:20:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAP-5=fWVLtNgAS+3f=2tTwH+4AGes=DtMBuivBMN79=Zzxz1iA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 6:32 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> > > jit_repipe_unwinding_info() copies unwinding_size and eh_frame_hdr_size > from the jitdump record into jd-> fields without checking them against > the actual payload size. Downstream, jit_add_eh_frame_info() in > genelf.c computes unwinding_table_size = unwinding_size - > eh_frame_hdr_size, which underflows when eh_frame_hdr_size > > unwinding_size. The result is passed as d->d_size to libelf, causing > an OOB heap read into the output ELF file. > > Validate that unwinding_size fits within the record payload and that > eh_frame_hdr_size does not exceed unwinding_size before allocating or > storing the values, so a bogus record cannot force a large allocation > that is then discarded. > > mapped_size is likewise taken from the record and was narrowed into an > int for the mmap2 len computation in jit_repipe_code_load() and > jit_repipe_code_move(); values above INT_MAX would turn negative, > producing a wrong mmap2 length. Use uint64_t for usize so the value > cannot truncate. > > Fixes: 0284fecd13b6db3e ("perf jit: Add unwinding support") > Reported-by: sashiko-bot <[email protected]> > Cc: Stefano Sanfilippo <[email protected]> > Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6 > Assisted-by: Opencode:mimo-v2.5-free > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Thanks! Ian > --- > tools/perf/util/jitdump.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c > index 5f3a53f818c29f58..385c19b864aeee4c 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/jitdump.c > @@ -462,7 +462,8 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_load(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr) > u16 idr_size; > const char *sym; > uint64_t count; > - int ret, csize, usize; > + int ret, csize; > + uint64_t usize; > pid_t nspid, pid, tid; > struct { > u32 pid, tid; > @@ -543,7 +544,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_load(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr) > > event->mmap2.pgoff = GEN_ELF_TEXT_OFFSET; > event->mmap2.start = addr; > - event->mmap2.len = usize ? ALIGN_8(csize) + usize : csize; > + event->mmap2.len = usize ? ALIGN_8((uint64_t)csize) + usize : (uint64_t)csize; > event->mmap2.pid = pid; > event->mmap2.tid = tid; > event->mmap2.ino = st.st_ino; > @@ -612,7 +613,7 @@ static int jit_repipe_code_move(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr) > char *filename; > size_t size; > struct stat st; > - int usize; > + uint64_t usize; > u16 idr_size; > int ret; > pid_t nspid, pid, tid; > @@ -761,6 +762,18 @@ jit_repipe_unwinding_info(struct jit_buf_desc *jd, union jr_entry *jr) > return -1; > > unwinding_data_size = jr->prefix.total_size - sizeof(jr->unwinding); > + > + /* > + * Validate sizes before allocating — jit_add_eh_frame_info() > + * computes unwinding_size - eh_frame_hdr_size and uses the > + * result as a buffer length for libelf. > + */ > + if (jr->unwinding.unwinding_size > unwinding_data_size || > + jr->unwinding.eh_frame_hdr_size > jr->unwinding.unwinding_size) { > + pr_warning("jitdump: invalid unwinding sizes in unwinding_info record\n"); > + return -1; > + } > + > unwinding_data = malloc(unwinding_data_size); > if (!unwinding_data) > return -1; > -- > 2.55.0 >