Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Improve frame pointer unwinding warning for s390

[email protected]
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-s390
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On s390 the kernel uses s390 back chain instead of frame pointers for
> stack tracing of user space since v6.7 commit aa44433ac4ee ("s390: add
> USER_STACKTRACE support").  This is because frame pointers on s390
> cannot be used for stack tracing. [1]
> 
> This requires user space to maintain a s390 back chain.  For instance
> user space to be built with compiler option '-mbackchain' (instead of
> '-fno-omit-frame-pointer' used on other architectures, which should
> better not be used on s390 [1]).
> 
> Only few distributions and users built user space with '-mbackchain'.
> Therefore '--call-graph fp' may not produce the expected results.
> 
> Commit ca76fb67ebdd ("perf evlist: Improve default event for s390")
> added a warning for s390 that wrongly claimed that "Framepointer
> unwinding lacks kernel support".  Change the warning to hint at using
> '--call-graph dwarf' if user space does not maintain a s390 back chain.
> 
> Note that '--call-graph fp' may also be useful for other applications,
> such as OpenJDK maintaining a s390 back chain (does not require JVM
> option '-XX:+PreserveFramePointer' on s390):
> 
>   $ perf record --call-graph fp ... -- \
>     java -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+DumpPerfMapAtExit ...
> 
> [1]: s390: Stack tracing using Frame Pointer, Back Chain, and SFrame,
>      https://conf.gnu-tools-cauldron.org/opo25/talk/Y3CVHY/
> 
> Fixes: ca76fb67ebdd ("perf evlist: Improve default event for s390")
> Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <[email protected]>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.