Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86: Add x86_pmu::print_debug

"Mi, Dapeng" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/6/2026 6:03 PM, Sandipan Das wrote:
> perf_event_print_debug() dumps the global control and status MSRs
> whenever x86_pmu.version >= 2, reading registers that exist only on
> Intel-compatible PMUs. This is not safe since x86_pmu.version is not
> Intel-specific and is now set by other vendors whose global registers
> use different addresses.
>
> As a first step, split perf_event_print_debug() in two. The register
> dump moves into a new common helper, x86_pmu_print_debug(), leaving
> perf_event_print_debug() to handle the preamble and dispatch to an
> optional x86_pmu::print_debug method. This lets each vendor-specific
> PMU dump its own global state before chaining into the common helper.
> PMUs that do not implement the method, such as those with
> x86_pmu.version < 2, get the common helper alone.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/core.c       | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index af0b67ffb43d..17dc53a62378 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>  	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>  }
>  
> -void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> +void x86_pmu_print_debug(int cpu)
>  {
>  	u64 ctrl, status, overflow, pmc_ctrl, pmc_count, prev_left, fixed;
>  	unsigned long *cntr_mask, *fixed_cntr_mask;
> @@ -1566,17 +1566,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
>  	u64 pebs, debugctl;
>  	int cpu, idx;
>  
> -	guard(irqsave)();
> -
> -	cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  	cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
>  	cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, cntr_mask);
>  	fixed_cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, fixed_cntr_mask);
>  	pebs_constraints = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, pebs_constraints);
>  
> -	if (!*(u64 *)cntr_mask)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (x86_pmu.version >= 2) {
>  		rdmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, ctrl);
>  		rdmsrq(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, status);
> @@ -1622,6 +1616,27 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
> +	unsigned long *cntr_mask;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	guard(irqsave)();
> +
> +	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> +	cntr_mask = hybrid(cpuc->pmu, cntr_mask);
> +
> +	if (!*(u64 *)cntr_mask)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (x86_pmu.print_debug)
> +		x86_pmu.print_debug(cpu);
> +	else
> +		x86_pmu_print_debug(cpu);

The logic looks good, but better change this to the static_call() just like
other x86_pmu callbacks. It eliminates the branch prediction cost. Thanks.


> +}
> +
>  void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index a8afea8d38f0..465bf513bb82 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -1052,6 +1052,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
>  	int				num_hybrid_pmus;
>  	struct x86_hybrid_pmu		*hybrid_pmu;
>  	enum intel_cpu_type (*get_hybrid_cpu_type)	(void);
> +
> +	void (*print_debug)(int cpu);
>  };
>  
>  struct x86_perf_task_context_opt {
> @@ -1316,6 +1318,8 @@ int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  
>  void x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap(struct pmu *pmu);
>  
> +void x86_pmu_print_debug(int cpu);
> +
>  static inline int x86_pmu_num_counters(struct pmu *pmu)
>  {
>  	return hweight64(hybrid(pmu, cntr_mask64));
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.