Re: [GIT PULL] thermal drivers fixes for v7.3-rc1
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0gi9n4ZAf7YZsf_dXhqYKA3DHZpR_fLmxgukogNKVbb6g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 5:16 PM Daniel Lezcano <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/12/26 14:50, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 2:43 PM Daniel Lezcano > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 8/12/26 13:28, Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel) wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 4:48 PM Daniel Lezcano > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi Rafael, > >>>> > >>>> please ignore this PR because there is a missing SoB. > >>>> > >>>> I'll fix it and meanwhile update the linux-next branch so it will fix > >>>> the build issue. > >>> > >>> Well, the build issue is still there in my thermal branch though. > >>> > >>> I've now remerged my linux-next branch to avoid exposing the thermal > >>> drivers merge I did previously and I'll wait for another PR from you. > >>> Worst-case I'll skip the thermal drivers material in my first 7.3-rc1 > >>> thermal PR. > >> There are 3 fixes on top of the PR. > >> > >> One is obviously to be folded with the existing series as it is my fault > >> I forgot to add the file after fixing a conflict [1] which led to the > >> linux-next build failure. > >> > >> But two were reported by lkp [2][3]. May I take the opportunity to fold > >> them with the patches they fix and shall I keep them as is ? > >> > >> [1] > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > >> > >> [2] > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > >> > >> [3] > >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > > > > At this point it's better to do additional fix commits on top of the > > previous material as it has all been exposed in my thermal branch for > > which there are no history rewrites. > > > > Please send me a PR with all of the fixes on top of the current HEAD > > of my thermal branch. > > Do you mean linux-pm/thermal ? Yes, that one.