Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 21 (drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko)
"Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pm,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-next |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJZ5v0gDQAbyo+KTgQ8CzUfJ6cv4xg6-rHbH-HcbfXCWX9Wc7g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 8:48 PM Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 03:27:32PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, August 24, 2026 9:15:16 PM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > On 8/21/26 8:32 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Changes since 20260820: > > > > > > > > None. > > > > > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 7073 > > > > 5989 files changed, 509370 insertions(+), 156446 deletions(-) > > > > > > on x86_64 allmodconfig: > > > > > > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'devm_iio_channel_get' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it. > > > WARNING: modpost: drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-mbg-tm.ko: module uses symbol 'iio_read_channel_processed' from namespace 'IIO_CONSUMER', but does not import it. > > > > Does the appended patch address it? > > > > Interestingly enough, it doesn't complain for me when I build the > > thermal tree merged on top of the current mainline. > > FWIW, I sent a fix for this two weeks ago that explains the semantic > conflict: > > https://lore.kernel.org/20260812-qcom-spmi-mbg-tm-ns-modpost-error-v1-1-d849390d2714@kernel.org/ > > You will only see it when the IIO tree is merged against the thermal > tree. I missed that one, thanks for the pointer!