Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] Tegra264 PWM support
Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:10:49 +0900
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-pwm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, July 14, 2026 6:35 PM Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 12:20:29PM +0900, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > > this adds support for the PWM controller on Tegra264. The controller > > is similar to previous generations, but the register fields are > > widened, the depth is made configurable, and the enable bit moves > > to a different spot. > > > > This series adds only basic support with fixed depth -- configurable > > depth will come later. > > > > Patch 1 adds device tree bindings for Tegra264 PWM (compatible > > string). > > > > Patch 2 prefixes driver-local macros and static helpers with > > tegra_/TEGRA_ to make their scoping clear. > > > > Patches 3 to 6 contain the PWM driver changes for Tegra264. > > > > Patch 7 adds device tree nodes for the PWM controllers on Tegra264. > > I'm not entirely happy with the driver (as already pointed out during > review of earlier revisions of this series), but it's an improvement. > I agree. > I'll take a look to improve the things that annoy me in this driver and > I didn't want to do that on the current state which would make it > necessary to respin your changes. > > So I applied patches #1 to #6 to > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next > . > Thank you! > I assume patch #7 will go via armsoc? If I should take this, too, please > tell me. My understanding is also that #7 will be picked up by Thierry. Best regards Mikko > > Best regards > Uwe