Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Clk improvements

Hi Maurice,

> On 31 Jul 2026, at 15:37, Maurice Hieronymus <[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Daniel,
>=20
> at your suggestion [0] I rebased my `clk_rate_exclusive_get()` binding =
for
> pwm-th1520 on top of this series, so it is now waiting on it to land. =
As v5
> has not seen any comments in the last few weeks, I wanted to ask what =
the
> current status is.

Nobody has replied so far. I don=E2=80=99t think there are any further =
comments.

>=20
> If there are no blockers left and you expect it to be merged soon, I =
am
> happy to keep waiting. Otherwise I would offer to send my series =
standalone
> against the current `Clk` API and let you rebase on top of mine - it =
is the
> much smaller of the two, touching only `Clk::rate_exclusive_get()` and
> pwm_th1520.rs.
>=20
> [0]: =
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/140FE1B3-73CA-45EA-B978-648A1A48B57=
[email protected]/
>=20
> Thanks a lot,
>=20
> Maurice

Your series might hit the same blocker as this one. Perhaps we can try =
to get
both merged at the same time?

@Stephen gentle ping here :)

=E2=80=94 Daniel