Re: [PATCHv2] md: clear MD_CLOSING when array_state_store() bails on interrupted lock
"yu kuai" <[email protected]> Sun, 19 Jul 2026 14:29:41 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-raid,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, 在 2026/7/17 13:12, Jack Wang 写道: > From: Jack Wang <[email protected]> > > Writing "clear", "readonly", "inactive" or "read_auto" to array_state > calls mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev(), which sets MD_CLOSING so the > array cannot be reopened while it is being torn down. The flag is only > cleared again at the tail of array_state_store() (for readonly, read_auto, > inactive, or the failed-clear case). > > Between setting the flag and reaching that tail there is an early return: > > err = mddev_lock(mddev); > if (err) > return err; > > mddev_lock() is mutex_lock_interruptible() on reconfig_mutex. If the > writing task is signalled while blocked there - easy to hit when the mutex > is held for a long time by a running resync/recovery or reshape - it > returns -EINTR and array_state_store() returns with MD_CLOSING still set. > do_md_stop()/md_set_readonly() never ran, so the array keeps working > internally, but every subsequent md_open() now returns -ENODEV for all > callers: the device still shows up in /proc/mdstat and sysfs is fully > populated, yet it cannot be opened and cannot be recovered without a > reboot (the remaining clear paths either need the device open or re-enter > test_and_set_bit(MD_CLOSING) and bail with -EBUSY before the clear). > > Route the interrupted-lock exit through a common label so the flag is > released. Guard the clear with a set_closing flag that records whether > this write actually set MD_CLOSING: when mddev->pers is already NULL (for > example a concurrent STOP_ARRAY is mid-teardown) this write skips the > mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev() call above, so it must not clear a > MD_CLOSING that the other thread owns - doing so could let the array be > reopened while it is being destroyed. This also tightens the pre-existing > tail clear, which had the same unconditional behaviour. > > mddev_unlock() is correctly skipped on the goto path since the lock was > never acquired. > > Fixes: 99b902ac1725 ("md: sync blockdev before stopping raid or setting readonly") > Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8 [Claude Code] > Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/md/md.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c > index d1465bcd86c8..7b7a4d925907 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/md.c > +++ b/drivers/md/md.c > @@ -4649,6 +4649,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len) > { > int err = 0; > enum array_state st = match_word(buf, array_states); > + bool set_closing = false; > > /* No lock dependent actions */ > switch (st) { > @@ -4668,6 +4669,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len) > err = mddev_set_closing_and_sync_blockdev(mddev, 0); > if (err) > return err; > + set_closing = true; > break; > default: > break; > @@ -4696,7 +4698,7 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len) > } > err = mddev_lock(mddev); > if (err) > - return err; > + goto out_clear_closing; Can you just clear MD_CLOSING here and still return err directly? I think this is much simpler. > > switch (st) { > case inactive: > @@ -4769,8 +4771,17 @@ array_state_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len) > } > mddev_unlock(mddev); > > - if (st == readonly || st == read_auto || st == inactive || > - (err && st == clear)) > +out_clear_closing: > + /* > + * Only clear MD_CLOSING if this write actually set it. Otherwise a > + * concurrent teardown (e.g. STOP_ARRAY) may own the flag - this write > + * would have skipped setting it above when mddev->pers was already > + * NULL - and clearing it here would let the array be reopened while it > + * is being destroyed. I don't think the comment is correct. Only one caller can set MD_CLOSING, concurrent teardown can't own the flag since this context already own the flag. > + */ > + if (set_closing && > + (st == readonly || st == read_auto || st == inactive || > + (err && st == clear))) > clear_bit(MD_CLOSING, &mddev->flags); > > return err ?: len; -- Thanks, Kuai