Re: [for-next v4 0/5] ionic: RDMA completion timestamping support
Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260722085555.GW110966@unreal> |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 02:15:32PM +0530, Abhijit Gangurde wrote: > > On 7/16/26 14:49, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 02:26:22PM +0530, Abhijit Gangurde wrote: > > > Thanks Leon. This is already addressed in https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/patch/[email protected]/ > > > which was sent after this series. Happy to rebase if needed. > > You need to rebase this, as we moved ib_respond_empty_udata() > > from the end of the function to the beginning. > > > > Also, please send this as a separate patch or series. > > > > Thanks. > > Hi Leon, > > The robust udata patch has been picked up, and this series still applies > cleanly on > the latest for-next. Are there any remaining concerns? Sorry, I didn't notice that it applies cleanly. Applied to wip/leon-for-next. Thanks.