Re: [PATCH net-next V7 4/4] devlink: Apply eswitch mode boot defaults
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:51:46 -0700
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 31 Jul 2026 16:52:25 +0300 Mark Bloch wrote: > >> Maybe "after_init()" ? "in" sounds like we can release it multiple > >> times but I think the idea is that it's the final, single "release > >> into the wild" unlock. > > > > ack > > Just to make sure I understand the proposal. > > AFAIU devl_unlock_after_init() can be used in one of two ways: > > Convert all devlink drivers to use it for the final unlock, including > drivers which don't support eswitch mode setting. > > That's a lot of churn for the few drivers which need this. > We'd also need to make sure existing drivers are converted and new > drivers use the right helper. We can add a WARN_ON(!registered) to the normal unlock and it will be impossible to miss the use of the wrong one? > Convert only drivers which support eswitch mode setting. > > Then applying the default becomes driver opt-in, which AFAIU we were > trying to avoid. For this feature it also looks very similar to the > explicit apply API Jiri objected to. Well, it would be a change to the init flow into which more things can be hooked. We could also make it a separate "driver ready" call, I guess, instead of packing it with the unlock. The point is that it's not a eswitch-mode dedicated callback that's easy to miss in a driver. > Which one do you have in mind? > > I don't think either option is great. Wouldn't it be simpler to queue > work from devl_register(), as before? That keeps the logic out of > devl_unlock() and doesn't require driver opt-in. Having to edit the drivers is not a concern to me. That said, I do agree that the API is somewhat awkward. It's a compromise. IDK.