Re: [PATCH net-next v3] rds: synchronize info callbacks with module unload
Chengfeng Ye <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Aug 2026 13:29:07 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-rdma,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAAo+4rWq5JTCOD36A9VEDEX0hLak8+MEXTUn7CxZrFb7YxMsMA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sat, Aug 1, 2026 at 7:09=E2=80=AFAM Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]= > wrote: > > From: Chengfeng Ye <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2026 00:09:42 +0800 > > rds_info_getsockopt() reads a callback from rds_info_funcs and invokes = it > > without protecting the callback's lifetime. Transport modules register > > functions stored in this array. For example, rds_tcp.ko registers > > rds_tcp_tc_info() for RDS_INFO_TCP_SOCKETS. > > > > This permits the following interleaving: > > > > CPU0 CPU1 > > rds_info_getsockopt() > > func =3D rds_tcp_tc_info > > rmmod rds_tcp > > rds_tcp_exit() > > rds_info_deregister_func() > > rds_info_funcs[offset] =3D NUL= L > > free rds_tcp module text > > func() > > > > The reader can therefore branch to an address in unloaded module text. > > > > Protect callback invocation with SRCU. Enter the SRCU read-side critic= al > > section before loading the callback and leave it only after the callbac= k > > returns. Clear the callback with release semantics and call > > synchronize_srcu() before deregistration returns, preventing module unl= oad > > from freeing its text while an old reader is still executing it. SRCU = is > > required because callbacks such as RDS_INFO_COUNTERS can sleep. > > > > Keep the callback array unannotated and use acquire and release operati= ons > > for publication so sparse does not have to apply __rcu through the > > function-pointer typedef. Replace the two callback-slot BUG_ON() check= s > > with WARN_ON_ONCE() and return without changing the slot on mismatch. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260720184955.3008978-1-nicoyip.d= [email protected]/ > > Suggested-by: Allison Henderson <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > Changes in v3: > > - Use ordinary loads for callback-slot validation under rds_info_lock; > > retain acquire semantics only for the lockless reader. > > - Drop the Fixes tag because this patch targets net-next. > > - Add Allison Henderson's Reviewed-by tag. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260727174826.135662-1-nicoyip.de= [email protected]/ [v2] > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Split the info callback/module-unload race from the independent > > inc->i_conn lifetime bug. > > - Keep the callback array unannotated and use smp_load_acquire() and > > smp_store_release() to resolve the sparse errors. > > - Replace the two touched callback-slot BUG_ON() checks with > > WARN_ON_ONCE() error paths. > > - Rewrite the commit message for the callback race and omit the unrelat= ed > > inc->i_conn KASAN report. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260720184955.3008978-1-nicoyip.d= [email protected]/ [v1] > > > > net/rds/info.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/rds/info.c b/net/rds/info.c > > index 21b32eb16559..385fefbfa07f 100644 > > --- a/net/rds/info.c > > +++ b/net/rds/info.c > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > > */ > > #include <linux/percpu.h> > > #include <linux/seq_file.h> > > +#include <linux/srcu.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/proc_fs.h> > > #include <linux/export.h> > > @@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ struct rds_info_iterator { > > unsigned long offset; > > }; > > > > +DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(rds_info_srcu); > > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rds_info_lock); > > static rds_info_func rds_info_funcs[RDS_INFO_LAST - RDS_INFO_FIRST + 1= ]; > > > > @@ -78,8 +80,12 @@ void rds_info_register_func(int optname, rds_info_fu= nc func) > > BUG_ON(optname < RDS_INFO_FIRST || optname > RDS_INFO_LAST); > > > > spin_lock(&rds_info_lock); > > - BUG_ON(rds_info_funcs[offset]); > > - rds_info_funcs[offset] =3D func; > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rds_info_funcs[offset])) { > > + spin_unlock(&rds_info_lock); > > + return; > > + } > > + /* Pair with lockless callback lookup. */ > > + smp_store_release(&rds_info_funcs[offset], func); > > Why is smp_store_release() necessary here ? and same for > smp_load_acquire() on the reader. > > I think just WRITE_ONCE() / READ_ONCE() should be enough. > > It's just a function pointer, not struct, and the reader > does not require any partial ordering, no ? > > > > spin_unlock(&rds_info_lock); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rds_info_register_func); > > @@ -91,9 +97,14 @@ void rds_info_deregister_func(int optname, rds_info_= func func) > > BUG_ON(optname < RDS_INFO_FIRST || optname > RDS_INFO_LAST); > > > > spin_lock(&rds_info_lock); > > - BUG_ON(rds_info_funcs[offset] !=3D func); > > - rds_info_funcs[offset] =3D NULL; > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rds_info_funcs[offset] !=3D func)) { > > + spin_unlock(&rds_info_lock); > > + return; > > + } > > + /* Hide the callback before waiting for old readers. */ > > + smp_store_release(&rds_info_funcs[offset], NULL); > > spin_unlock(&rds_info_lock); > > + synchronize_srcu(&rds_info_srcu); > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rds_info_deregister_func); > > > > @@ -165,6 +176,7 @@ int rds_info_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int op= tname, sockopt_t *opt) > > int npages =3D 0; > > int ret; > > int len; > > + int srcu_idx; > > nit: please keep the reverse xmas tree order. Hi, Indeed WRITE/READ_ONCE should suffice for this code, maybe we don't need that smp store/load despite it looks more secure. I will make a v4 patch to address it as well as the reverse xmas tree order problem. Best Regards, Chengfeng