Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] pmdomain: renesas: Add R-Car X5H MDLC driver
Marek Vasut <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 00:38:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-renesas-soc,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-pm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/5/26 5:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hello Geert,
[...]
> +DEFINE_MDLC_RESET_WRAPPER(reset)
> +DEFINE_MDLC_RESET_WRAPPER(assert)
> +DEFINE_MDLC_RESET_WRAPPER(deassert)
> +DEFINE_MDLC_RESET_WRAPPER(status)
> +
> +static const struct reset_control_ops r8a78000_mdlc_reset_ops = {
> + .reset = r8a78000_mdlc_reset,
> + .assert = r8a78000_mdlc_assert,
> + .deassert = r8a78000_mdlc_deassert,
> + .status = r8a78000_mdlc_status,
> +};
Please keep the list sorted alphabetically.
> +static int r8a78000_mdlc_attach_dev(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct r8a78000_mdlc_priv *priv;
> + struct of_phandle_args pd_spec;
> + const struct mod_map *map;
> + unsigned int id;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
> + "#power-domain-cells", 0, &pd_spec);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (pd_spec.args_count != 2) {
> + of_node_put(pd_spec.np);
Maybe some "goto error" fail path which does of_node_put() wouldn't hurt
here, since the of_node_put() is duplicated in here multiple times.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &r8a78000_mdlc_lock) {
> + hlist_for_each_entry(priv, &r8a78000_mdlc_list, link) {
> + if (priv->np == pd_spec.np)
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!priv) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: MDLC %pOF not found\n", __func__, pd_spec.np);
> + of_node_put(pd_spec.np);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + id = pd_spec.args[1];
> + of_node_put(pd_spec.np);
> +
> + map = mod_map_find(priv->mod_map, id);
> + if (!map) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Unknown module 0x%x\n", id);
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Ignoring HW module 0x%x\n", id);
> + return 0;
> +}
[...]
> +static int r8a78000_mdlc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct r8a78000_mdlc_priv *priv;
> + const struct mdlc_info *info;
> + struct resource *res;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = r8a78000_genpd_always_on_singleton(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + info = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + priv->dev = dev;
> + priv->np = np;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> + if (!res)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + for (; info->base; info++) {
> + if (info->base == res->start)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!info->base) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unsupported MDLC instance 0x%pa\n", &res->start);
return dev_err_probe() might be more appropriate here, even if that
would be more chatty until the support for various MDLC nodes lands.
Some dev_info_probe() would be even better, but we don't have that.
[...]