Re: [RFC PATCH] sysfs: Add /sys/kernel/realtime entry
Clark Williams <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jul 2026 12:18:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-rt-users,dev.linux.lists.driver-core,dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alfA3ZaM1kmFaicG@demetrius> |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 01:07:18PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2026-07-10 18:01:20 [+0200], Florian Bezdeka wrote: > > Depends on what you consider a valid update scenario. Updating from 6.1- > > rt with sysfs available to something like 6.18 (no sysfs anymore) will > > still break - as long as you do not (force) update userspace in > > lockstep. > > v6.1-RT to v6-18 no-rt will not provide the file. Also will not provide > ARM, PowerPC or 8250-nbcon support. So it is not just that single thing > that you "lose" if you don't apply the RT patch. It is just what you > notice because you don't use the other things. > > > I learned meanwhile that our detection moved to uname meanwhile, so this > > is not a problem for us anymore. > > Okay. So you yelled loudly that you need it, now not anymore. > > So can we state that this it does not provide anything of value, is not > considered needed and can be dropped? > > Clark, what is the status on your end? > I still carry it in v6.1-rt and v6.6-rt and don't really see a reason not to. I don't believe it's a security risk since a write to /sys/kernel/realtime gets ignored; it's just there to say that this is a PREEMPT_RT kernel. So, I'm ambivalent on the keep or drop question. I'll go ahead and clean up what I'm carrying in v6.1-rt and v6.6-rt and if we decide to keep it I'll send you the updated changes. Clark -- The United States Coast Guard Ruining Natural Selection since 1790