Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: s390: Remove cond_resched() calls
Claudio Imbrenda <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-s390,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Organization | IBM |
| Message-ID | <20260729184548.38b7c791@p-imbrenda> |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:24:28 +0200 Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote: > Since [1] cond_resched() is a no-op on s390. Remove all calls. > > [1] commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes") > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> > --- > arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h | 1 - > arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 8 ++------ > arch/s390/kvm/gmap.c | 4 ---- > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 - > arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 1 - > arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 1 - > arch/s390/mm/gmap_helpers.c | 1 - > 7 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h > index d919e69662f5..795da130342a 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/uv.h > @@ -461,7 +461,6 @@ static inline int uv_call_sched(unsigned long r1, unsigned long r2) > > do { > cc = __uv_call(r1, r2); > - cond_resched(); > } while (cc > 1); > return cc; > } so now uv_call_sched() is the same as uv_call()? just drop uv_call_sched() then [...]