RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: samsung: exynos990: Fix PERIS gate clock parents

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Griffin <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2026 6:02 PM
> To: Denzeel Oliva <[email protected]>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>; Sylwester Nawrocki
> <[email protected]>; Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>;
> Alim Akhtar <[email protected]>; Michael Turquette
> <[email protected]>; Stephen Boyd <[email protected]>; Brian
> Masney <[email protected]>; Rob Herring <[email protected]>; Conor
> Dooley <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-arm-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: samsung: exynos990: Fix PERIS gate clock
> parents
> 
> Hi Krysztof & Denzeel,
> 
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2026 at 13:36, Denzeel Oliva <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Correct eight PERIS gate clock parents to match the hardware clock
> > tree and reorder the GIC mux parents so mout_peris_bus_user is the
> > default source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Denzeel Oliva <[email protected]>
> > ---
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Griffin <[email protected]>
> 
> @Krysztof: I was thinking, maybe we should establish a new rule/best
> practice for Samsung clock upstream submissions whereby patch
> contributors should link to the downstream cal-if code for the SoC after the --
> - line. That would make reviewing the patches' correctness a bit easier, as the
> downstream cal-if code would be readily available to the reviewer.
> 
We can leave this choice to the reviewer if they want to refer to downstream cal-if code.

Regards
Alim

> regards,
> 
> Peter
>