Re: [PATCH 01/13] mm: introduce vma_flags_can_grow() and vma_can_grow()
"Zi Yan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,dev.linux.lists.virtualization,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx,org.freedesktop.lists.intel-xe,org.freedesktop.lists.nouveau,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-fbdev,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mips,org.kernel.vger.linux-sound,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra,org.kvack.linux-mm,org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon Jun 29, 2026 at 3:25 PM EDT, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > These test whether the VMA has stack sematics, i.e. is able to grow upwards > or downwards depending on the architecture. > > In order to account for arches which do not support upward-growing stacks, > introduce VMA_GROWSUP whose definition depends on the architecture > supporting it, and use vma_flags_test_single_mask() in vma_flags_can_grow() > to account for this. > > Update the VMA userland tests to reflect the changes > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/mm.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- > tools/testing/vma/include/dup.h | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <[email protected]> -- Best Regards, Yan, Zi