Re: [PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: mailbox: goog-mba: Add goog-mba mailbox bindings

Hi,
  Replying in one place to the two main points of contention ...

1) Compatible string :-
   I too think leaving it too generic is a bit bold ... we often think
it is final but more often it turns out to not be so. But I also don't
particularly like the idea of naming it after the SoC because
controller IPs are usually not tied to a SoC. So giving it a
controller version specific name should be good. I hope we treat all
controllers as potentially 3rd reusable blocks rather than a part of
SoC's identity.

2) Single-channel Controllers vs Multi-channel Controller :-
  Looking at the description of h/w, especially the separate and
optional register sets and the fact that we are not talking runtime
ad-hoc links between two endpoints, I lean towards single-channel
controllers implementation. That seems like tidier dts+code.

Regards,
Jassi