Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: mfd: Use generic power-controller schema
Rob Herring <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-samsung-soc,dev.linux.lists.mfd,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-rockchip,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 10:16:35PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > The generic power-controller.yaml schema has been added to dt-schema[1], > providing a common definition for the `system-power-controller` boolean > property. Convert MFD bindings that locally define this property to > instead reference the shared schema. > > The common change across all patches is: > - Add a $ref to /schemas/power/power-controller.yaml# > - Remove the local `system-power-controller` property definition > - Switch from additionalProperties to unevaluatedProperties > > This is a pick of patches 2-11 from [2], rebased to linux-next/master, > no changes. Patch 1 (the generic power-controller.yaml schema itself) > is dropped since it has already been picked up by dt-schema. > > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/187 > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/177523251875.1559844.9690289848283345069.b4-ty@b4/ > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > --- > Peng Fan (10): > dt-bindings: mfd: ene-kb[3]930: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps65910: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: rockchip,rk8x: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: ricoh,rn5t618: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: netronix,ntxec: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: ti,twl: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps6594: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: rohm,bd71828-pmic: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: fsl,mc13xxx: Use generic power-controller schema > dt-bindings: mfd: samsung,s2mpg10-pmic: Use generic power-controller schema Can we hold off on this until at least the next cycle. This change effectively bumps the minimum version of dtschema. While power-controller.yaml is added to dtschema, it is not yet in a released version. I'm not all that sure these changes are much improvement given it is a single boolean. Rob