Re: [PATCH net v3] sctp: socket: remove unused 'err' parameter from sctp_skb_recv_datagram
Xin Long <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:25:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-sctp,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADvbK_dxAc+oepu05pvoj5Ze93u6tMdB-6QQQRaMVhznM_9MTg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 2:19=E2=80=AFPM David Laight <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:10:21 -0400 > Xin Long <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 4:21=E2=80=AFAM luoqing <[email protected]> w= rote: > > > > > > From: luoqing <[email protected]> > > > > > > The 'err' parameter in sctp_skb_recv_datagram() is never used by any > > > of its callers. Both sctp_recvmsg() and sctp_ulpevent_read_nxtinfo() > > > pass the address of a local variable but never check its value after > > > the function returns, rendering the parameter completely useless. > > > > > > Remove the unused parameter to simplify the function signature and > > > eliminate dead code. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: luoqing <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > include/net/sctp/sctp.h | 2 +- > > > net/sctp/socket.c | 10 +++------- > > > net/sctp/ulpevent.c | 3 +-- > > > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h > > > index d50c27812504..b86d50d6b146 100644 > > > --- a/include/net/sctp/sctp.h > > > +++ b/include/net/sctp/sctp.h > > > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void sctp_sock_rfree(struct sk_buff *skb); > > > > > > extern struct percpu_counter sctp_sockets_allocated; > > > int sctp_asconf_mgmt(struct sctp_sock *, struct sctp_sockaddr_entry = *); > > > -struct sk_buff *sctp_skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *, int, int *); > > > +struct sk_buff *sctp_skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, int flags); > > > > > > typedef int (*sctp_callback_t)(struct sctp_endpoint *, struct sctp_t= ransport *, void *); > > > void sctp_transport_walk_start(struct rhashtable_iter *iter); > > > diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c > > > index c7b9e325ec1c..3804382d78e0 100644 > > > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c > > > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c > > > @@ -2123,7 +2123,7 @@ static int sctp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct= msghdr *msg, size_t len, > > > goto out; > > > } > > > > > > - skb =3D sctp_skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err); > > > + skb =3D sctp_skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags); > > > if (!skb) > > > goto out; > > > > > > @@ -9082,7 +9082,7 @@ static int sctp_wait_for_packet(struct sock *sk= , int *err, long *timeo_p) > > > * Note: This is pretty much the same routine as in core/datagram.c > > > * with a few changes to make lksctp work. > > > */ > > > -struct sk_buff *sctp_skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, int flags, i= nt *err) > > > +struct sk_buff *sctp_skb_recv_datagram(struct sock *sk, int flags) > > > { > > > int error; > > > struct sk_buff *skb; > > > @@ -9120,17 +9120,13 @@ struct sk_buff *sctp_skb_recv_datagram(struct= sock *sk, int flags, int *err) > > > if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) > > > break; > > > > > > - > > > /* User doesn't want to wait. */ > > > error =3D -EAGAIN; > > > if (!timeo) > > > goto no_packet; > > > - } while (sctp_wait_for_packet(sk, err, &timeo) =3D=3D 0); > > > - > > > - return NULL; > > > + } while (sctp_wait_for_packet(sk, &error, &timeo) =3D=3D 0); > > > > > > no_packet: > > > - *err =3D error; > > > return NULL; > > > } > > > > > > diff --git a/net/sctp/ulpevent.c b/net/sctp/ulpevent.c > > > index 8920ca92a011..8ed51a15c3a4 100644 > > > --- a/net/sctp/ulpevent.c > > > +++ b/net/sctp/ulpevent.c > > > @@ -1061,9 +1061,8 @@ void sctp_ulpevent_read_nxtinfo(const struct sc= tp_ulpevent *event, > > > struct sock *sk) > > > { > > > struct sk_buff *skb; > > > - int err; > > > > > > - skb =3D sctp_skb_recv_datagram(sk, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT, &= err); > > > + skb =3D sctp_skb_recv_datagram(sk, MSG_PEEK | MSG_DONTWAIT); > > > if (skb !=3D NULL) { > > > __sctp_ulpevent_read_nxtinfo(sctp_skb2event(skb), > > > msghdr, skb); > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > I think it's used at [1] in sctp_recvmsg(): > > > > skb =3D sctp_skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, &err); > > if (!skb) > > goto out; > > Would it make more sense to ERR_PTR() etc ? > Let's keep consistent with skb_recv_datagram() where it's &err, besides, there's a shutdown condition (returns 0 via err param). Thanks.