Re: [PATCH -next] lockdown: Add break in lockdown_write
Nicolas Bouchinet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <akdjuyJ7tGefNNUW@archlinux> |
On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 12:50:18PM -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 12:41???PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 4:31???AM Xiu Jianfeng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 1/19/2026 5:12 PM, Cai Xinchen wrote: > > > > After the label is matched successful, any other levels judgements > > > > are meaningless. Therefore, add break to return early > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cai Xinchen <[email protected]> > > > > > > Looks good to me, thanks. > > > > > > Acked-by: Xiu Jianfeng <[email protected]> > > > > > > Paul, > > > > > > Would you mind if this patch went through the LSM tree? :) > > > > Assuming Nicolas is okay with that, I can take this through the LSM tree. > > Following up on this as I never saw a response on-list and the patch > doesn't appear to be in Linus' tree. Your right, my bad, First of all, thanks Cai for your contribution and I appologize for the really late reply. This is pretty much the same kind of patch as [1], while it effectively cleans up Lockdown code, in my opinion it doesn't directly add much. I'd personally prefer to keep those small patches on hold for now, waiting for a bigger review of Lockdown's code where I will pick them both up. Sadly, I really don't have much time to work on this right now. Nicolas --- [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/