Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: add bpf_init_inode_xattr kfunc for atomic inode labeling

"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-security-module,org.kernel.vger.bpf,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-integrity,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest,org.kernel.vger.selinux
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed Jul 8, 2026 at 2:09 AM CEST, David Windsor wrote:
> Many in-kernel LSMs (SELinux, Smack, IMA) store security labels in
> extended attributes. For these LSMs, atomic labeling during inode
> creation is critical: if the inode becomes accessible before its xattr
> is set, it is briefly unlabeled, which can disrupt LSMs making policy
> decisions based on file labels.
>
> Existing LSMs solve this by setting xattrs directly in the
> inode_init_security hook, which runs before the inode becomes
> accessible. BPF LSM programs currently lack this capability because
> the hook uses an output parameter (xattr_count) that BPF programs
> cannot write to, and existing kfuncs like bpf_set_dentry_xattr
> require a dentry that isn't available until after the inode is
> accessible.
>
> This series introduces the bpf_init_inode_xattr() kfunc, which takes
> the combined inode_init_security xattr context argument and claims a
> slot in it via the new security_lsmxattr_add() LSM helper.
>

There are various CI failures in newly added tests, I don't think any of them
are passing. Please fix before respinning.

https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/12730

E.g. both test_init_inode_xattr and test_init_inode_xattr_slot do not have
expected results.

pw-bot: cr

> [...]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.