Re: [PATCH v4] serial: 8250_of: clear stuck empty-FIFO RX-timeout on LPC32xx

Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-serial,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.stable
Organization Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 04:39:20PM -0300, Ryan Wilbur wrote:
> The NXP LPC32xx UART (PORT_LPC3220) can latch an RX character-timeout
> interrupt while the RX FIFO is empty: IIR reports UART_IIR_RX_TIMEOUT
> (0x0c) but LSR.DR is clear. A character timeout is only cleared by
> reading RHR, but serial8250_rx_chars() reads RHR only when LSR.DR is
> set, so nothing ever clears the condition. The interrupt is
> level-triggered and re-fires immediately, so on a single-core ARM926
> the resulting interrupt storm livelocks the CPU.
> 
> It is reproducible when userspace repeatedly opens the front-panel port
> (ttyS1): serial8250_do_set_termios() re-enables interrupts on unlock and
> the handler then spins forever with iir=0xcc lsr=0x60 ier=0x05, tripping
> the soft-lockup detector in serial8250_handle_irq_locked().
> 
> LPC32xx has no dedicated 8250 glue driver, it's driven by the generic
> 8250_of. Add a hardware specific handle_irq for PORT_LPC3220, wired up
> in of_platform_serial_setup() the same way fsl8250_handle_irq is
> installed. The handler follows dw8250_handle_irq(): on an RX timeout
> with an empty FIFO (LSR.DR and LSR.BI clear) it does one throwaway RHR
> read to clear the condition, then calls serial8250_handle_irq_locked().
> No real received data is ever discarded, and it is a no-op on healthy
> UARTs which never report a timeout with DR clear.
> 
> This is the same class of bug already worked around in other 8250 drivers;
> see commit 424d79183af0 ("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid "too much work" from bogus rx timeout interrupt")
> which reports the identical iir=0xcc/lsr=0x60. See also
> UART_RX_TIMEOUT_QUIRK in 8250_omap, and the note in 8250_bcm7271.

As long as this quirk is not anymore in the generic 8250 code, I'm fine with it
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.