Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] serial: 8250_dw: add Ambarella CV75 quirks

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 09:33:45AM +0000, Long Zhao wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2026 16:56
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 06:35:13PM +0800, Long Zhao via B4 Relay wrote:
> 
> > Add CV75 platform data with an ETOI IER mask and skip-set-rate so the 
> > DesignWare 8250 driver can drive the Ambarella UART for console use.

> Thanks for the review. Agreed the commit message was too brief.

...

> > +	/* Keep variant-specific bits in the shadow across subsequent 
> > +updates. */
> 
> This says what code is doing. Instead it must say "why?" the code is doing this.
> 
> > +	up->ier |= d->pdata->ier_mask;
> > +	serial_port_out(p, UART_IER, up->ier);

...

> In case there is an HW bug, where can we get the errata, please? (For a bare
> minimum add a reference to the Errata document you give to the customers.)

> This is not a silicon erratum. The Ambarella UART is not Synopsys
> DesignWare IP; it is an Ambarella 8250-compatible UART. We still use
> the snps-dw-apb-uart binding / 8250_dw because the programming model
> matches closely enough, with two quirks (ETOI IER bit and
> SKIP_SET_RATE). I will expand the commit message and rewrite the
> comment to explain why in the next revision.

Okay, what does it make to think that 8250_dw is a suitable choice?
What are the features that are repetitive would be if you use a custom
8250-based driver (using the generic 8250 code)?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko