Re: [PATCH 6/7] i2c: qcom-geni: Use common GENI resource initialization helper

On 8/5/2026 1:27 AM, Praveen Talari wrote:

[...]

> @@ -228,10 +228,13 @@ static int qcom_geni_i2c_conf(struct geni_se *se, unsigned long freq)
>   	val |= itr->t_low_cnt << LOW_COUNTER_SHFT;
>   	val |= itr->t_cycle_cnt;
>   	writel_relaxed(val, gi2c->se.base + SE_I2C_SCL_COUNTERS);
> +
>   	trace_geni_i2c_bus_setup(gi2c->se.dev, gi2c->clk_freq_out,
>   				 itr->clk_div, itr->t_high_cnt,
>   				 itr->t_low_cnt, itr->t_cycle_cnt);
> -	return 0;
> +

This looks wrong to me.
First accessed registers and then we are setting ICC vote ? we should 
enable resources first.

> +	return geni_icc_set_bw_ab(&gi2c->se, GENI_DEFAULT_BW, GENI_DEFAULT_BW,
> +				  Bps_to_icc(gi2c->clk_freq_out));
>   }
>   
>   static void geni_i2c_err_misc(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c)
> @@ -1100,24 +1103,6 @@ static int geni_i2c_init(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static int geni_i2c_resources_init(struct geni_se *se)
> -{
> -	struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c = dev_get_drvdata(se->dev);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = geni_se_resources_init(&gi2c->se);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	ret = geni_i2c_clk_map_idx(gi2c);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return dev_err_probe(gi2c->se.dev, ret, "Invalid clk frequency %d Hz\n",
> -				     gi2c->clk_freq_out);
> -
> -	return geni_icc_set_bw_ab(&gi2c->se, GENI_DEFAULT_BW, GENI_DEFAULT_BW,
> -				  Bps_to_icc(gi2c->clk_freq_out));
> -}
> -
>   static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c;
> @@ -1188,6 +1173,11 @@ static int geni_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		return ret;
>   
> +	ret = geni_i2c_clk_map_idx(gi2c);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(gi2c->se.dev, ret, "Invalid clk frequency %d Hz\n",
> +				     gi2c->clk_freq_out);
> +

why not move to geni_i2c_init() ?

Check recent patch @ i2c: qcom-geni: add I2C frequency table for 32 MHz 
firmware-based SEs.

Let's agree to move there, to avoid issue.

>   	ret = i2c_add_adapter(&gi2c->adap);
>   	if (ret)
>   		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Error adding i2c adapter\n");
> @@ -1281,7 +1271,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops geni_i2c_pm_ops = {
>   };
>   
>   static const struct geni_i2c_desc geni_i2c = {
> -	.resources_init = geni_i2c_resources_init,
> +	.resources_init = geni_se_resources_init,

why to add common driver function to i2c ? and also spi, uart ?
Can we not call that function from within i2c specific hookup function ? 
i think design wise should keep i2c as local function.

Also driver specific anything can be managed in local function.

>   	.set_rate = qcom_geni_i2c_conf,
>   	.power_on = geni_se_resources_activate,
>   	.power_off = geni_se_resources_deactivate,
> @@ -1290,7 +1280,7 @@ static const struct geni_i2c_desc geni_i2c = {
>   static const struct geni_i2c_desc i2c_master_hub = {
>   	.no_dma_support = true,
>   	.tx_fifo_depth = 16,
> -	.resources_init = geni_i2c_resources_init,
> +	.resources_init = geni_se_resources_init,
>   	.set_rate = qcom_geni_i2c_conf,
>   	.power_on = geni_se_resources_activate,
>   	.power_off = geni_se_resources_deactivate,
>