Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: Restrict KVM-induced symbol exports to KVM

Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-sgx,dev.linux.lists.linux-coco,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 09:39:40AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Leverage and extend KVM's macro shenanigans to export symbols for KVM if
> and only if kvm{,-amd,intel}.ko is being built as a module, and only for
> the KVM modules that are being built.
> 
> Note, this approach isn't 100% precise, as exports that are only strictly
> necessary for one of KVM's modules will get exported for all KVM modules.
> But I don't see any value in being super precise as it's not like kvm.ko is
> any more trustworthy tha kvm-{amd,intel}.ko (and it's easy to circumvent
> "for module" exports by abusing module names (in out-of-tree code)).  And
> maintaining precise exports would likely be a nightmare (as would writing
> the macros to get the exports right).
> 
> Patches 1-3 drop superfluous exports that I found while digging around for
> KVM-only exports.
> 
> Sean Christopherson (4):
>   x86/bugs: Drop unnecessary export of "x86_spec_ctrl_base"
>   x86/mtrr: Drop unnecessary export of "mtrr_state"
>   x86/mm: Drop unnecessary export of "ptdump_walk_pgd_level_debugfs"
>   x86: Restrict KVM-induced symbol exports to KVM modules where
>     obvious/possible

Nice!

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.