答复: [外部邮件] Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: F ix SRCU list traversal

> On 2/4/26 17:53, lirongqing wrote:
> > Replace list_for_each_entry_rcu() with list_for_each_entry_srcu() when
> > traversing the encl->mm_list protected by SRCU. This ensures proper
> > synchronization annotation and avoids potential lockdep warnings about
> > incorrect RCU usage.
> 
> Does lockdep trip on this today?
> 
> > The list is protected by encl->srcu, not RCU, so the SRCU-specific
> > iterator with srcu_read_lock_held() annotation is required.
> 
> From a quick look, list_for_each_entry_rcu() still seems *really* common
> under SRCU. It also looks like list_for_each_entry_srcu() is a relatively recent
> (2020) addition to the kernel.
> 
> So, this wasn't a bug when the SGX code went in, but started causing a
> problem at some point? Did lockdep add some RCU warnings or something
> that made this necessary?
> 
> The patch seems logical and all. I just feel like I'm missing the bigger picture.

Seem this patch adds the check

commit 28875945ba98d1b47a8a706812b6494d165bb0a0
Author: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Jul 16 18:12:22 2019 -0400

    rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking

    This commit adds RCU-reader checks to list_for_each_entry_rcu() and
    hlist_for_each_entry_rcu().  These checks are optional, and are indicated
    by a lockdep expression passed to a new optional argument to these two
    macros.  If this optional lockdep expression is omitted, these two macros
    act as before, checking for an RCU read-side critical section.

    Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
    [ paulmck: Update to eliminate return within macro and update comment. ]
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>


And there are several similar fixes:

d681107 nvme-multipath: fix suspicious RCU usage warning
5dd18f0 nvme/multipath: Fix RCU list traversal to use SRCU primitive
6d1c699 nvme/host: Fix RCU list traversal to use SRCU primitive
6a0c617 KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning
df9a30f kvm: mmu: page_track: Fix RCU list API usage

[Li,Rongqing]