答复: [PATCH][v2] x86/sgx: Use list_for_each_ entry_srcu() for mm_list traversal
"Li,Rongqing(ACG CCN)" <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Apr 2026 07:47:54 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-sgx,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From: Li RongQing <[email protected]> > > In commit 1728ab54b4be ("x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer") (v5.11), > list_for_each_entry_rcu() was used to traverse the enclave's mm_list. > However, this is incorrect because the list is protected by a Sleepable RCU (SRCU) > lock (encl->srcu). > > Since commit 28875945ba98 ("rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader > checking") (v5.4), RCU lockdep checking has become stricter. When > CONFIG_PROVE_RCU is enabled, using the standard list_for_each_entry_rcu() > while only holding an SRCU lock triggers "suspicious RCU usage" false positive > warnings, as it does not recognize SRCU read-side critical sections. > > Fix this by switching to list_for_each_entry_srcu(), which was introduced > specifically for this purpose in commit ae2212a7216b > ("rculist: Introduce list/hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() macros") (v5.10). > This correctly associates the traversal with the SRCU lock and eliminates the > lockdep warnings. > > Fixes: 1728ab54b4be ("x86/sgx: Add a page reclaimer") > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]> > --- Ping thanks [Li,Rongqing] > Diff with v1: rewrite changelog > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 12 ++++++++---- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c > index ac60ebd..91362d7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c > @@ -822,7 +822,8 @@ static struct sgx_encl_mm *sgx_encl_find_mm(struct > sgx_encl *encl, > > idx = srcu_read_lock(&encl->srcu); > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &encl->mm_list, list) { > + list_for_each_entry_srcu(tmp, &encl->mm_list, list, > + srcu_read_lock_held(&encl->srcu)) { > if (tmp->mm == mm) { > encl_mm = tmp; > break; > @@ -933,7 +934,8 @@ const cpumask_t *sgx_encl_cpumask(struct sgx_encl > *encl) > > idx = srcu_read_lock(&encl->srcu); > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list) { > + list_for_each_entry_srcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list, > + srcu_read_lock_held(&encl->srcu)) { > if (!mmget_not_zero(encl_mm->mm)) > continue; > > @@ -1018,7 +1020,8 @@ static struct mem_cgroup > *sgx_encl_get_mem_cgroup(struct sgx_encl *encl) > */ > idx = srcu_read_lock(&encl->srcu); > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list) { > + list_for_each_entry_srcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list, > + srcu_read_lock_held(&encl->srcu)) { > if (!mmget_not_zero(encl_mm->mm)) > continue; > > @@ -1212,7 +1215,8 @@ void sgx_zap_enclave_ptes(struct sgx_encl *encl, > unsigned long addr) > > idx = srcu_read_lock(&encl->srcu); > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list) { > + list_for_each_entry_srcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list, > + srcu_read_lock_held(&encl->srcu)) { > if (!mmget_not_zero(encl_mm->mm)) > continue; > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c > index 38b7fd2..581e0c4 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c > @@ -120,7 +120,8 @@ static bool sgx_reclaimer_age(struct sgx_epc_page > *epc_page) > > idx = srcu_read_lock(&encl->srcu); > > - list_for_each_entry_rcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list) { > + list_for_each_entry_srcu(encl_mm, &encl->mm_list, list, > + srcu_read_lock_held(&encl->srcu)) { > if (!mmget_not_zero(encl_mm->mm)) > continue; > > -- > 2.9.4