Re: [PATCH 05/30] mm/rmap: update mm/interval_tree.c comments

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 01:23:16PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Update the file comment to clarify that both file-backed and anonymous
> interval trees are provided, referencing the relevant data types for
> clarity.
> 
> Also add comments to indicate which parts of the file apply to each.
> 
> While we're here, convert the VM_BUG_ON_VMA() to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_VMA().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]>

This is fine for now, but I'm wondering if it doesn't make sense to, in the
long term, have:

mm/rmap.c - common rmap mechanisms
mm/anon_rmap.c - anon rmap gunk
mm/file_rmap.c - file rmap gunk

or even something like mm/rmap/{core,anon,file,ksm??}.c

While working on my file rmap patches I noticed there's so much stuff just
splurged all over rmap.c - interval_tree.c - fs.h - fs/inode.c.
It's a little silly.

-- 
Pedro