Re: [PATCH 17/30] mm: prefer vma_[start,end]_pgoff() to vma->vm_pgoff in kernel/
Gregory Price <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:09:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-sgx,dev.linux.lists.damon,dev.linux.lists.iommu,dev.linux.lists.nvdimm,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.kernel.vger.kvm,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users,org.kernel.vger.linux-tegra,org.kernel.vger.linux-trace-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <alELDgm258nhjk3b@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 11:49:18AM -0400, Gregory Price wrote: > > > > Silly question: > > There's no such thing :) > All my questions are silly. That's my secret :] > > > > What's the purpose of retaining tags in a non-address value? > > Well if you want to reconstitute an address from it later then that'd be the > intent, but I'm being hand wavey here for sure. > > Main thing is to retain stuff under the page mask > Right, which ... vvvvvv > > That sounds like there's fragility just waiting to be broken. If that's an actual issue, then our relationship with tags is painful :[ ~Gregory