Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] sh: remove NUMA and SPARSEMEM support
Mike Rapoport <[email protected]> Fri, 3 Jul 2026 09:16:38 +0300
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kvack.linux-mm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Adrian, On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 12:25:47PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hello Mike, > > On Thu, 2026-07-02 at 13:20 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > I feel like this is an attempt to force me to give up as a maintainer. > > > > This isn't an attempt to force you to give up, this is an attempt to merge > > patches that have been out there for long time. > > You posted these patches the first time in April. This isn't a long time. It is by mm standards. > > This isn't about sh, this is about reducing NUMA and SPARSEMEM_STATIC > > footprint to ease the maintenance. > > Yes, and I will eventually pick up those patches to rectify this. Why do you insist that these patches must go via sh-linux tree? If you don't have time right now because of other commitments, Andrew is here to help in exactly these cases: let patches move upstream when a subsystem maintainer is too overloaded. > Adrian -- Sincerely yours, Mike.