Re: [PATCH 18/26] sh: maple: introduce callback_mutex in maple_device
Florian Fuchs <[email protected]> Sat, 4 Jul 2026 17:48:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-sh,org.infradead.lists.linux-mtd,org.kernel.vger.linux-input,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <akkrQJfxSCvUptC4@lithos> |
Hi Dmitry, On 03 Jul 22:57, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > The Maple bus core invokes client callbacks asynchronously from a > workqueue (maple_dma_handler). If a device is removed (or closed) while > a callback is in flight, it can lead to UAF bugs if the driver's private > data is freed. > > Introduce callback_mutex in struct maple_device to synchronize > callback registration/modification and callback invocation. > > Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.5-flash > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/sh/maple/maple.c | 9 +++++++-- > include/linux/maple.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/sh/maple/maple.c b/drivers/sh/maple/maple.c > index c0715e3ace6f..7c82b7a8a280 100644 > --- a/drivers/sh/maple/maple.c > +++ b/drivers/sh/maple/maple.c > @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ void maple_getcond_callback(struct maple_device *dev, > void (*callback) (struct mapleq *mq), > unsigned long interval, unsigned long function) > { > + guard(mutex)(&dev->callback_mutex); > dev->callback = callback; > dev->interval = interval; > dev->function = cpu_to_be32(function); > @@ -230,11 +231,13 @@ static struct maple_device *maple_alloc_dev(int port, int unit) > mdev->dev.bus = &maple_bus_type; > mdev->dev.parent = &maple_bus; > init_waitqueue_head(&mdev->maple_wait); > + mutex_init(&mdev->callback_mutex); > return mdev; > } > > static void maple_free_dev(struct maple_device *mdev) > { > + mutex_destroy(&mdev->callback_mutex); > kmem_cache_free(maple_queue_cache, mdev->mq->recvbuf); > kfree(mdev->mq); > kfree(mdev); > @@ -655,8 +658,10 @@ static void maple_dma_handler(struct work_struct *work) > break; > > case MAPLE_RESPONSE_DATATRF: > - if (mdev->callback) > - mdev->callback(mq); > + scoped_guard(mutex, &mdev->callback_mutex) { > + if (mdev->callback) > + mdev->callback(mq); > + } > atomic_set(&mdev->busy, 0); > wake_up(&mdev->maple_wait); > break; > diff --git a/include/linux/maple.h b/include/linux/maple.h > index 641cf3330409..48ed7558b8ab 100644 > --- a/include/linux/maple.h > +++ b/include/linux/maple.h > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ > #define __LINUX_MAPLE_H > > #include <linux/device.h> > +#include <linux/mutex.h> > #include <mach/maple.h> > > /* Maple Bus command and response codes */ > @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct maple_device { > char product_licence[64]; > atomic_t busy; > wait_queue_head_t maple_wait; > + struct mutex callback_mutex; > struct device dev; > }; > > > -- > 2.55.0.rc0.799.gd6f94ed593-goog > Thank you so much for your efforts. I can confirm sashikos finding in my test (that I saw later), that this patch hangs the bus if a VMU memcard is inserted. So that the peripherals don't work anymore after insertion of the memcard. With a last log like: Dreamcast_visual_memory 3:01.E: VMU at (3, 1) is busy Regards Florian