Re: [PATCH 22/26] ASoC: codecs: wm8962: Use guard() for mutex locks
Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-sound,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 23/07/2026 5:53 am, [email protected] wrote: > From: bui duc phuc <[email protected]> > > Clean up the code using guard() for mutex locks. > Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change. > > Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <[email protected]> > --- > sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c | 13 ++++--------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c > index 2db822fc1de7..8a9598161b35 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/moduleparam.h> > #include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/cleanup.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > #include <linux/pm.h> > @@ -1564,11 +1565,10 @@ static int wm8962_dsp2_ena_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol); > struct wm8962_priv *wm8962 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component); > int old = wm8962->dsp2_ena; > - int ret = 0; > int dsp2_running = snd_soc_component_read(component, WM8962_DSP2_POWER_MANAGEMENT) & > WM8962_DSP2_ENA; > > - mutex_lock(&wm8962->dsp2_ena_lock); > + guard(mutex)(&wm8962->dsp2_ena_lock); > > if (ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]) > wm8962->dsp2_ena |= 1 << shift; > @@ -1576,9 +1576,7 @@ static int wm8962_dsp2_ena_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > wm8962->dsp2_ena &= ~(1 << shift); > > if (wm8962->dsp2_ena == old) > - goto out; > - > - ret = 1; > + return 0; > > if (dsp2_running) { > if (wm8962->dsp2_ena) > @@ -1587,10 +1585,7 @@ static int wm8962_dsp2_ena_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, > wm8962_dsp2_stop(component); > } > > -out: > - mutex_unlock(&wm8962->dsp2_ena_lock); > - > - return ret; > + return 1; > } > > /* The VU bits for the headphones are in a different register to the mute Reviewed-by: Richard Fitzgerald <[email protected]>