Re: make xfs sparse-warning free

On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 09:56:51AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I know you looked at that clang context thing earlier, and assumed
> that that is what triggered this work in the first place?

In this case not directly, although patch 2 was originally done for
that.  Patch 1 is newer than those experiments, but only because we
just started using lockref in this merge window, and it should apply
for that as well.

> > Patch 3 duplicates some XFS code to work around the lock context tracking,
> > but I think it is pretty silly.
> 
> makes me go "if you have to make the code worse to make sparse happy,
> maybe just look at the clang context tracking instead?"

Well, that's why I said I didn't like it it and included it more as
an example for the sparse developers to see what goes wrong.

> Because I *assume* that the more complete clang context tracking
> series doesn't need that?

I assume the same, but the quota changes the cause this are new, and I
haven't combined them yet with the context tracking experiments I did a
while ago.