[PATCH] overflow: Update is_non_negative() and is_negative() comment

The is_non_negative() and is_negative() function-like macros initially
exist as a workaround to silence the -Wtype-limits warning. Now that
this warning is disabled, those two macros have lost their raison
d'être. Or so we thought.

In reality, smatch still produces a similar warning and so, it is
unfortunately still too early to undo this workaround.

Update the comment to point to smatch instead of GCC's -Wtype-limits.
Add a link to the thread in which this was discovered.

Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANiq72=jRT+6+2PBgshsK-TpxPiRK70H-+3D6sYaN-fdfC83qw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Vincent Mailhol <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/overflow.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
index 736f633b2d5f..d84194fc783b 100644
--- a/include/linux/overflow.h
+++ b/include/linux/overflow.h
@@ -37,8 +37,8 @@
 #define type_min(t)	__type_min(typeof(t))
 
 /*
- * Avoids triggering -Wtype-limits compilation warning,
- * while using unsigned data types to check a < 0.
+ * Avoids triggering "unsigned 'a' is never less than zero" smatch warning,
+ * Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
  */
 #define is_non_negative(a) ((a) > 0 || (a) == 0)
 #define is_negative(a) (!(is_non_negative(a)))
-- 
2.52.0