Re: SECOND REMINDER on Qlogic driver license conversion

Greg KH <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-spdx
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:00:17AM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Dear Qlogic driver maintainers, dear Nilesh, deat Shahed, dear Manish,
> 
> 
> during an unrelated kernel clean-up task, I noticed some LICENSE files for 
> the qlogic drivers hanging around in Documentation.
> 
> Thomas Gleixner has provided you a patch series in June 2019 to pick up or 
> simply add a Reviewed-by tag here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spdx/[email protected]
> 
> As it seems from the public mailing list archive, you have never responded 
> to Thomas' request. If you could indicate that the change is fine for you,
> I am happy to rebase the patch series to the current next tree, so that 
> Thomas can pick that up and let it travel through the spdx tree to Linus 
> for the next release.
> 
> See first reminder here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spdx/alpine.DEB.2.21.2006300644130.4919@felia/
> 
> Just to let you know, I will send a third reminder in a few months, and 
> if there is no response to that, I will just send a patch to mark those 
> drivers where [email protected] or 
> [email protected] are maintainers as Orphaned, just to keep 
> MAINTAINERS reflect the actual state.

This is why I hate having "group aliases" as maintainers.  It doesn't
work as we never know who "really" is maintaining the code, and there is
no accountability.

Given the length of a lack of response so far, I would suggest just
marking it orphaned now.  If someone wants to step up in the future to
maintain it, great, but it needs to be a person, not an email alias.

thanks,

greg k-h
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.