Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] btrfs: factor a fscrypt_name matching method

David Sterba <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-spdx,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fscrypt
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 06:00:13AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 12:15:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Facebook
> > > + */
> > 
> > Please use only SPDX in new files
> > 
> > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Developer%27s_FAQ#Copyright_notices_in_files.2C_SPDX
> 
> The wiki is incorrect.  The SPDX tag deals with the licensing tags
> only.  It is not a replacement for the copyright notice in any way, and
> having been involved with Copyright enforcement I can tell you that
> at least in some jurisdictions Copytight notices absolutely do matter.

I believe you and can update the wiki text so it's more explicit about
the license an copyright.

Otherwise I don't see much point in the copyright notices unless they're
complete list of every person and company that touched that file. With
that we haven't been adding that to new files for some time and I want
to be consistent with that. In each case the patch author was asked to
resubmit without the notice. It worked so far.

If not, either the patch will be respectfully rejected or somebody
else creates the file first and then the patch applied.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.