Re: [PATCH v2 10/20] btrfs: factor a fscrypt_name matching method
J Lovejoy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-spdx,org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fscrypt |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/9/22 7:34 AM, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 06:00:13AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 12:15:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>>> +/* >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Facebook >>>> + */ >>> Please use only SPDX in new files >>> >>> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Developer%27s_FAQ#Copyright_notices_in_files.2C_SPDX >> The wiki is incorrect. The SPDX tag deals with the licensing tags >> only. It is not a replacement for the copyright notice in any way, and >> having been involved with Copyright enforcement I can tell you that >> at least in some jurisdictions Copytight notices absolutely do matter. > I believe you and can update the wiki text so it's more explicit about > the license an copyright. Can you update the wiki text to remove "SPDX" from the heading and remove the sentence stating, "An initiative started in 2017 [1] aims to unify licensing information in all files using SPDX tags, this is driven by the Linux Foundation." Thanks, Jilayne