Re: [PATCH] LICENSES: Explicitly allow SPDX-FileCopyrightText
Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Jan 2026 21:29:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-spdx,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 07:52:31PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 06:12:47PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Sources already have SPDX-FileCopyrightText (~40 instances) and more > > appear on the mailing list, so document that it is allowed. On the > > other hand SPDX defines several other tags like SPDX-FileType, so add > > checkpatch rule to narrow desired tags only to two of them - license and > > copyright. That way no new tags would sneak in to the kernel unnoticed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > Other way would be to remove SPDX-FileCopyrightText from existing files > > and disallow this, but one way or another we should be explicit about > > it. Otherwise people will be sending more of these and each maintainer > > would need to make their own call. > > --- > > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst | 2 ++ > > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 +++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst > > index 59a7832df7d0..8d7c0214f283 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst > > @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ License identifier syntax > > '#!PATH_TO_INTERPRETER' in the first line. For those scripts the SPDX > > identifier goes into the second line. > > As you are adding a copyright identifier, this sentence should probably > be: > For those scripts, the SPDX license identifier goes into the > second line. > > > + Identifier line can be followed by another one with SPDX-FileCopyrightText. > > How about: > > "The license identifier line can then be followed by a > SPDX-FileCopyrightText line if desired." I'd write "by one of multiple" instead of "by a" as multiple copyright owners for the same file is common in the kernel. > > + > > | > > > > 2. Style: > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > > index 362a8d1cd327..98261ee97e2b 100755 > > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > > @@ -3844,6 +3844,15 @@ sub process { > > "Misplaced SPDX-License-Identifier tag - use line $checklicenseline instead\n" . $herecurr); > > } > > > > +# check for unused SPDX file tags > > # check for unsupported SPDX file tags -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart