Re: [PATCH v3] LICENSES: Explicitly allow SPDX-FileCopyrightText
Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> Sun, 1 Mar 2026 14:49:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-spdx,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.workflows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Mar 01, 2026 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Sources already have SPDX-FileCopyrightText (~40 instances) and more > appear on the mailing list, so document that it is allowed. On the > other hand SPDX defines several other tags like SPDX-FileType, so add > checkpatch rule to narrow desired tags only to two of them - license and > copyright. That way no new tags would sneak in to the kernel unnoticed. > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> > > --- > > Other way would be to remove SPDX-FileCopyrightText from existing files > and disallow this, but one way or another we should be explicit about > it. Otherwise people will be sending more of these and each maintainer > would need to make their own call. Ack. > Changes in v3: > 1. Typo "or multiple" > > Changes in v2: > 1. Doc adjustments based on feedback from Greg and Laurent. > 2. "unused" -> "unsupported" > 3. Drop redundant blank line > --- > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst | 7 +++++-- > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst > index 59a7832df7d0..b0176bb8a465 100644 > --- a/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst > +++ b/Documentation/process/license-rules.rst > @@ -63,8 +63,11 @@ License identifier syntax > The SPDX license identifier in kernel files shall be added at the first > possible line in a file which can contain a comment. For the majority > of files this is the first line, except for scripts which require the > - '#!PATH_TO_INTERPRETER' in the first line. For those scripts the SPDX > - identifier goes into the second line. > + '#!PATH_TO_INTERPRETER' in the first line. For those scripts, the SPDX > + license identifier goes into the second line. > + > + The license identifier line can then be followed by one or multiple > + SPDX-FileCopyrightText lines if desired. > > | > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > index bec7930cdd66..e317cf2ffc58 100755 > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl > @@ -3856,6 +3856,14 @@ sub process { > "Misplaced SPDX-License-Identifier tag - use line $checklicenseline instead\n" . $herecurr); > } > > +# check for unsupported SPDX file tags > + if ($rawline =~ /\bSPDX-.*:/ && > + $rawline !~ /\bSPDX-License-Identifier:/ && > + $rawline !~ /\bSPDX-FileCopyrightText:/) { > + WARN("SPDX_LICENSE_TAG", > + "Unsupported SPDX tag\n" . $herecurr); I'd write "nonallowed" instead of "unsupported", possibly because I may not be familiar with the usage of "supported" in this acceptation. With or without that change, Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> > + } > + > # line length limit (with some exclusions) > # > # There are a few types of lines that may extend beyond $max_line_length: -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart