Re: [PATCH] spi: sprd-adi: Fix probe succeeding without registering the controller
Baolin Wang <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 14:09:35 +0800
| Newsgroups | org.kernel.vger.linux-spi,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 7/26/26 3:22 PM, Babanpreet Singh wrote:
> With CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK=n the of_hwspin_lock_get_id() stub returns 0
> unconditionally. In sprd_adi_probe() the guard
>
> if (ret > 0 || (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK) && ret == 0))
>
> is false for that 0, so it takes the else branch, where the switch has no
> case for 0 and lands in
>
> default:
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to find hwlock id\n");
>
> dev_err_probe() returns its err argument unchanged, so probe logs
> "failed to find hwlock id" and then returns 0, reporting success.
> sprd_adi_hw_init(), the restart handler and devm_spi_register_controller()
> are all skipped: the device binds but no SPI controller is ever
> registered. Since the stub is a constant-returning static inline, the
> compiler folds the whole remainder of probe away as dead code - an
> object built in that configuration contains no reference to
> devm_spi_register_controller() at all.
>
> The hardware spinlock is optional for this controller and the -ENOENT arm
> already covers "no hardware spinlock supplied". Treat the stub's 0 the
> same way and continue without a lock; all four users of sadi->hwlock
> already test it for NULL.
>
> This is not reachable on production kernels. Kconfig has
>
> depends on HWSPINLOCK || (COMPILE_TEST && !HWSPINLOCK)
>
> so the affected configuration exists only under COMPILE_TEST, where no
> real hardware is present. Object code for CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK=y builds is
> byte-identical before and after this change.
>
> Found by smatch:
> drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c:560 sprd_adi_probe() warn: passing zero to 'dev_err_probe'
>
> Fixes: f9adf61e983f ("spi: sprd: adi: Change hwlock to be optional")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Babanpreet Singh <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c
> index e7d83c16b46c..7c29115c5b8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sprd-adi.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,11 @@ static int sprd_adi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENXIO;
> } else {
> switch (ret) {
> + case 0:
> + /*
> + * Only reachable with CONFIG_HWSPINLOCK=n, where the
> + * of_hwspin_lock_get_id() stub returns 0.
> + */
Please add a 'fallthrough' here. With that, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
> case -ENOENT:
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "no hardware spinlock supplied\n");
> break;