Re: Do we care if C compilers start allowing "." on pointers?

"Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains
Message-ID <e46c4ec1-30d6-43fe-9b5f-c3ed1007e454@paulmck-laptop>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:16:24PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 07:02:14AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > Currently, given a pointer "p", C allows p->a but not p.a.  There is a
> > proposal from C++ [1] that is being considered for C.
> > 
> > Do we care?
> 
> After buying a new WTF'o'meter -- reading about this proposal definitely
> shattered the old one -- I'm with everybody else so far, this will not
> make C better, and if it ever were to pass, we should ensure the kernel
> does not use it.

You should see some of the other proposals!  Or maybe not?  After
all, you should get some use out of your new WTF'o'meter.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.