Re: [PATCH v4 28/39] unwind_user/deferred: Add deferred unwinding interface

On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 09:17:18AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 02:51:27PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 03:16:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > The ctx_ctr is always incremented before calling this, so 0 isn't a
> > valid cookie.
> 
> Right, so that's the problem. You're considering 0 an invalid cookie,
> but ctx_to_cookie(0, 1<<48) will be a 0 cookie.
> 
> That thing *will* wrap.

Well, yes, after N years of sustained very high syscall activity on CPU
0, with stack tracing enabled, in which multiple tracer unwind requests
happen to occur in the same entry context where ctx_ctr wrapped, one of
the tracers might get an invalid cookie.

I can double-increment the counter when it's (1UL << 48) - 1).  Or use
some other bit for "cookie valid".

-- 
Josh