Re: [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel

Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.kernel.vger.linux-toolchains,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.live-patching
Message-ID <20250213025201.tyo3jcp4gcivydyd@jpoimboe>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:40:33PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:10 PM Indu Bhagat <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > > I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
> > > the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested both Puranjay's
> > > version [3] and my version [4].
> > >
> > > For gcc 14.2.1, I have seen the following issue with this
> > > test [2]. This happens with both upstream and 6.13.2.
> > > The livepatch loaded fine, but the system spilled out the
> > > following warning quickly.
> > >
> >
> > In presence of the issue
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666, I'd expect bad
> > data in SFrame section.  Which may be causing this symptom?
> >
> > To be clear, the issue affects loaded kernel modules.  I cannot tell for
> > certain - is there module loading involved in your test ?
> 
> The KLP is a module, I guess that is also affected?
> 
> During kpatch-build, we added some logic to drop the .sframe section.
> I guess this is wrong, as we need the .sframe section when we apply
> the next KLP. However, I don't think the issue is caused by missing
> .sframe section.

Right, it looks like it unwound through the patch module just fine.

-- 
Josh
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.