Re: [PATCH 0/8] unwind, arm64: add sframe unwinder for kernel

Song Liu <[email protected]> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:38 AM Puranjay Mohan <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> P.S. - The livepatch doesn't have copy_process() but only copy_signal(),
>> yours had copy_process() somehow.
>
> In my build, copy_signal is inlined to copy_process, unless I add noinline.
> If I do add noinline, the issue will not reproduce.
>
> I tried more combinations. The issue doesn't reproduce if I either
> 1) add noinline to copy_signal, so we are not patching the whole
>    copy_process function;
> or
> 2) Switch compiler from gcc 14.2.1 to gcc 11.5.0.
>
> So it appears something in gcc 14.2.1 is causing live patch to fail
> for copy_process().

So, can you test your RFC set (without SFRAME) with gcc 14.2.1, so we
can be sure that it is not a sframe problem?

And about having the .sframe section in the livepatch module, I realised
that this set doesn't include support for reading/using sframe data from
any module(livepatches included), so the patch I added for generating
.sframe in kpatch is irrelevant because it is a no-op with the current setup.

Thanks,
Puranjay

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIoEARYKADIWIQQ3wHGvVs/5bdl78BKwwPkjG3B2nQUCZ65whhQccHVyYW5qYXlA
a2VybmVsLm9yZwAKCRCwwPkjG3B2nXWqAP9pVx9qJCjxq8KKmY3TYqtRawZ5avzZ
L9AnG4+ojKoTFgEAjMbsGnNIDh7r5dpbZs7ds6oAq67Xuxw73oRLsXNrrgY=
=wSlN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----